Energy data fragmentation is not a storage problem. It is a decision-making problem. Most European energy companies already hold the time series data they need. They cannot get it into one consistent, trusted shape fast enough to act on it.uns one of the most mature battery markets in Europe. It is also the clearest warning of what maturity does to returns. UK battery storage revenue no longer comes from the service that built the market. It increasingly comes from trading.

Ask a Head of IT or a CTO at a European utility where their time series data lives. The honest answer is usually: everywhere.
Meter readings sit in one system. SCADA telemetry sits in another. Market prices arrive from exchanges and vendors in a third format. Forecasts land in spreadsheets. Each source carries its own resolution, its own timestamp convention, and its own definition of a missing value.
Every axis is growing at once. Renewables reached 47.3% of EU electricity generation in 2025, according to Eurostat, and wind and solar produce high-frequency, weather-driven series rather than predictable baseload profiles. Around 60% of European households held an electricity smart meter at the end of 2024, and the European Commission has committed to accelerating the rollout further. The ENTSO-E Transparency Platform publishes pan-European market data at resolutions down to 15 minutes.
More sources. Higher frequency. Tighter reporting deadlines. The same integration architecture as five years ago.
Fragmentation is expensive in three ways, and only one of them appears in an IT business case.
Preparation time. Data teams spend up to 80% of their time preparing data that already exists, just not in the right shape (Volue analysis, drawn from PowerTSM deployments across more than 100 energy companies). That is capacity paid for as analysis and consumed as plumbing.
Decision divergence. When two teams answer the same question differently, decisions slow down. A trading desk and a grid planning team working from separate versions of the same consumption series will reach separate conclusions. Reconciling them takes days. Explaining the discrepancy to a regulator takes longer.
Key-person fragility. Custom pipelines depend on the individuals who built them. Every departure becomes an operational risk that nobody has priced.
Your trading team's data and your grid planning team's data live in different worlds. PowerTSM closes that gap automatically, in fractions of a second.
Stefan KomornyikVP Time Series Hub, Volue
A time series hub is not a data lake with an energy label attached. Three capabilities separate the two.
Automatic harmonisation
Volue PowerTSM collects from every source simultaneously and resolves resolution, unit, and timestamp differences on ingestion. Downstream systems receive one consistent structure, whatever the origin.
Validation as a rule, not a script
Incoming values are checked against configurable business rules before they reach any downstream process. Anomalies, gaps, and implausible readings surface on arrival, rather than in a settlement dispute three months later.
Versioning by default
Every value change carries an author, a timestamp, and a reason, across all three time dimensions: historical, operational, and forecast. Audit preparation becomes a query instead of a project. For distribution businesses facing growing settlement and flexibility market obligations, that traceability is the difference between confidence and exposure.
Scale claims deserve production numbers, so here they are. PowerTSM processes more than 17 petabytes of time series data per month. It manages over 100 million time series in production, for more than 100 energy companies across 15 European countries. Performance stays linear as volumes grow. Some series run at second-level granularity, and queries return in fractions of a second, including during peak intraday trading.
Behind those numbers sits 35 years of energy domain expertise. PowerTSM joined Volue through the acquisition of HAKOM, a business built exclusively around energy time series. The domain assumptions are in the product, not in your integration layer.
The most common objection is architectural, and it is fair: operations cannot pause for a migration.
They do not have to. The pattern that works across PowerTSM deployments is narrow and sequential.
Each additional use case costs less than the last, because the hub already holds validated, versioned series. The economics improve as coverage grows, which is the opposite of how custom pipeline estates behave.
The IEA notes that digital technologies could avoid substantial global grid investment through to 2050 by extending asset lifetimes and integrating renewables more efficiently. That value depends on data that systems can act on without manual intervention.
Every serious energy data initiative rests on one assumption: that the underlying time series are complete, consistent, and traceable. Forecasting rests on it. Flexibility management rests on it. AI rests on it entirely. Most organizations discover the assumption is wrong halfway through the project.
A single source of truth for time series is the cheapest work in the programme and the only work that compounds. Every use case added afterwards inherits the benefit.
The PowerTSM Proof of Value programme tests the platform against your data, your workflows, and your technical requirements, before any commercial commitment. If an internal build performs better, you will know. If PowerTSM performs better, you will know that too.